Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Paul Macklesworth stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPaul Macklesworth(You)Deloitte LLPKPMG LLPERNST & YOUNG LLPAtosGRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLP
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #2 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #3 | AT Atos Peer · rank #4 | GT GRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLP Peer · rank #5 | PM Paul Macklesworth (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £420.8m | £314.8m | £99.3m | £76.9m | £13.6m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.7m | £40.1m | £963k | £1.2m | £389k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.8bn | £4.7bn | £1.8bn | £6.3bn | £243.7m | £3.3m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 92 | 93 | 56 | 11 | 61 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —