Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How See pdf for breakdown per provider stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSee pdf for breakdown per provider(You)KPMG LLPOptima Health UK LimitedLotus Home Care LimitedPRIVATE HOME CARE UK LIMITEDCity & County Care Services Ltd
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | OH Optima Health UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | LH Lotus Home Care Limited Peer · rank #3 | PH PRIVATE HOME CARE UK LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | C& City & County Care Services Ltd Peer · rank #5 | SP See pdf for breakdown per provider (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £289.6m | £29.6m | £13.8m | £13.1m | £13.1m | £505k(−96%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £18.1m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.6bn | £44.2m | £25.0m | £15.0m | £15.3m | £2.3m(−91%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 90 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —