Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How University of Nottingham stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortUniversity of Nottingham(You)KPMG LLPPhoenix Software LimitedOracle Corporation UK LimitedMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDSVL Business Solutions
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #2 | OC Oracle Corporation UK Limited Peer · rank #3 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | SB SVL Business Solutions Peer · rank #5 | UO University of Nottingham (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £294.1m | £149.4m | £59.0m | £2.0m | £299k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £471k | £2.6m | £22k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £3.7bn | £987.3m | £1.5bn | £2.1m | £30.5m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 220 | 70 | 75 | 2 | 3 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —