Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How WHSmith stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortWHSmith(You)Bray Leino LtdBestWay LimitedWarwick ConferencesSMT Management Consultants LtdTHE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER CONFERENCES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | WH WHSmith (You) · target supplier | BL Bray Leino Ltd Peer · rank #2 | BE BestWay Limited Peer · rank #3 | WC Warwick Conferences Peer · rank #4 | SM SMT Management Consultants Ltd Peer · rank #5 | TU THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER CONFERENCES LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £19.0m | £125k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £19.5m(+2455%) | £99.1m | £3.0m | £763k | £645k | £580k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —