Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Hayley Toyne t/a Baybury Marketing & Communications stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHayley Toyne t/a Baybury Marketing & Communications(You)The London Community FoundationBaringa Partners LLPMCKINSEY & COMPANY LME LIMITEDInc. United KingdomChemonics Group UK Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TL The London Community Foundation Peer · rank #1 | BP Baringa Partners LLP Peer · rank #2 | M& MCKINSEY & COMPANY LME LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | IU Inc. United Kingdom Peer · rank #4 | HT Hayley Toyne t/a Baybury Marketing & Communications (You) · target supplier | CG Chemonics Group UK Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £29.4m | £20.7m | £777k | £665k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £21.2m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £29.4m | £166.9m | £201.1m | £68.4m | £50k(−100%) | £13.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 24 | 3 | 2 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —