Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Therser stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTherser(You)Facultatieve Technologies LtdSibor LtdHHV LtdTherser (UK) LtdCeramic Drying Systems Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | FT Facultatieve Technologies Ltd Peer · rank #1 | SI Sibor Ltd Peer · rank #2 | TH Therser (You) · target supplier | HH HHV Ltd Peer · rank #4 | T( Therser (UK) Ltd Peer · rank #5 | CD Ceramic Drying Systems Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.1m | £111k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £71.1m | £725k | £258k(−69%) | £919k | £829k | £490k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 1 | — | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —