Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Stanmore Unitised Facades Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortStanmore Unitised Facades Limited(You)METROPOLIS PROJECTS LIMITEDPierra Restoration Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MP METROPOLIS PROJECTS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SU Stanmore Unitised Facades Limited (You) · target supplier | PR Pierra Restoration Ltd Peer · rank #3 |
|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | |||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £754k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.7m | £18k(−100%) | £96.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | — | 1 |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 13 | 1(−90%) | 8 |
| Unique public buyersDistinct buying authorities | 1 | 1(−67%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —