Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Pendergate Ltd t/a Kindred stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPendergate Ltd t/a Kindred(You)Mitie FM LimitedCaterlinkAspens Services LtdSport and Leisure ManagementTotally Local Company Ltd
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MF Mitie FM Limited Peer · rank #1 | CA Caterlink Peer · rank #2 | AS Aspens Services Ltd Peer · rank #3 | PL Pendergate Ltd t/a Kindred (You) · target supplier | SA Sport and Leisure Management Peer · rank #5 | TL Totally Local Company Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £288.3m | £26.8m | £25.2m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.1bn | £199.3m | £508.5m | £2.0m(−99%) | £379.1m | £8.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 8 | 18 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —