Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Instarmac stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortInstarmac(You)Kier ConstructionMULTEVO LIMITEDRingway Infrastructure Services LimitedMarlborough Highways LimitedWJ South Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | MU MULTEVO LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | IN Instarmac (You) · target supplier | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #4 | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #5 | WS WJ South Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £774k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £2.0bn | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.4bn | £76.6m | £6.6m(−99%) | £4.8bn | £451.1m | £21.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —