Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Tri Star Packaging stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTri Star Packaging(You)Nobisco LtdBunzl UK Ltd (Trading as Bunzl Catering Supplies)ALLIANCE DISPOSABLES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | NO Nobisco Ltd Peer · rank #1 | BU Bunzl UK Ltd (Trading as Bunzl Catering Supplies) Peer · rank #2 | AD ALLIANCE DISPOSABLES LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | TS Tri Star Packaging (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.7m | £720k | £163k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £30.9m | £720k | £31.2m | £259k(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 1 | 10 | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 43 | 1 | 88 | 3(−93%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —