Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Philips UKI stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPhilips UKI(You)Medequip Assistive Technology LtdGetinge LtdConvaTec LimitedNRS HealthcareWA Products (UK) Limited t/a SceneSafe
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA Medequip Assistive Technology Ltd Peer · rank #1 | GE Getinge Ltd Peer · rank #2 | PU Philips UKI (You) · target supplier | CO ConvaTec Limited Peer · rank #4 | NH NRS Healthcare Peer · rank #5 | WP WA Products (UK) Limited t/a SceneSafe Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £8.5m | £2.4m | £12k(−100%) | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £240k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £822.4m | £77.5m | £12k(−100%) | £95.5m | £1.0bn | £3.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 16 | 1(−91%) | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —