Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Spider Projects stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSpider Projects(You)Mace Consult LimitedJacobs UK LtdEDF Energy Customers LtdPRPAlternative Heat Ltd
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #1 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | EE EDF Energy Customers Ltd Peer · rank #3 | PR PRP Peer · rank #4 | SP Spider Projects (You) · target supplier | AH Alternative Heat Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £70.7m | £47.9m | £6.9m | £762k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.6m | £264k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £738.3m | £1.4bn | £10.9bn | £101.6m | £1.3m(−100%) | £168.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 15 | 79 | 7 | 2 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —