Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Rex Procter & Partners stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRex Procter & Partners(You)Kier ConstructionCAVENDISH NUCLEAR LIMITEDAECOM LIMITEDLOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITEDG F Tomlinson Building Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | CN CAVENDISH NUCLEAR LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | LP LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | GF G F Tomlinson Building Limited Peer · rank #5 | RP Rex Procter & Partners (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £575.0m | £223.8m | £174.0m | £14.1m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £113.2m | £5.5m | £1.0m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.6bn | £953.1m | £834.6m | £1.3bn | £155.2m | £2.9m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 2 | 144 | 9 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —