Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MITSUBISHI PENCIL CO. UK stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMITSUBISHI PENCIL CO. UK(You)Banner Group LtdBATES OFFICE SERVICES LTDLYRECO UK LIMITEDAntalisWL Coller LTD
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BG Banner Group Ltd Peer · rank #1 | BO BATES OFFICE SERVICES LTD Peer · rank #2 | LU LYRECO UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | AN Antalis Peer · rank #4 | MP MITSUBISHI PENCIL CO. UK (You) · target supplier | WC WL Coller LTD Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £25.9m | £7.3m | £5.2m | £70k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £750k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £640.6m | £426.9m | £353.7m | £18.1m | £1.8m(−99%) | £5.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 46 | 24 | 29 | 2 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —