Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MKD 32 Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMKD 32 Ltd(You)BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITEDVEOLIA ES (UK) LIMITEDN&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITEDIndaver Rivenhall LimitedFFC Waste Services (UK) Limited
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BW BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | VE VEOLIA ES (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | NC N&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | M3 MKD 32 Ltd (You) · target supplier | IR Indaver Rivenhall Limited Peer · rank #5 | FW FFC Waste Services (UK) Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £203.5m | £10.9m | £0.03 | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £927.9m | £11.3m | — | £1.1bn | £510.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 33 | 24 | 4 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —