Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Mi Hub Ltd trading as Yaffy stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMi Hub Ltd trading as Yaffy(You)BATES OFFICE SERVICES LTDLYRECO UK LIMITEDBanner LimitedCooneen Defence LtdARROW COUNTY SUPPLIES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BO BATES OFFICE SERVICES LTD Peer · rank #1 | LU LYRECO UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | BA Banner Limited Peer · rank #3 | CD Cooneen Defence Ltd Peer · rank #4 | MH Mi Hub Ltd trading as Yaffy (You) · target supplier | AC ARROW COUNTY SUPPLIES LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.3m | £5.2m | £3.7m | £190k | £120k(−97%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £750k | — | — | £29.7m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £426.9m | £353.7m | £56.8m | £118.0m | £920k(−99%) | £69.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 24 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 1(−80%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —