Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Alan Conisbee and Associates Ltd T/A Conisbee stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 15 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAlan Conisbee and Associates Ltd T/A Conisbee(You)Telent Technology Services LimitedGRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLPPRPDRAX (UK) LIMITEDInenco Group
iAuto-picked from 15 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TT Telent Technology Services Limited Peer · rank #1 | GT GRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLP Peer · rank #2 | PR PRP Peer · rank #3 | D( DRAX (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AC Alan Conisbee and Associates Ltd T/A Conisbee (You) · target supplier | IG Inenco Group Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £55.6m | £8.2m | £762k | £350k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £138k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £666.3m | £235.1m | £101.6m | £14.8m | — | £504.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 14 | 25 | 2 | 2 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —