Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Lee Hect Harrison Penna Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLee Hect Harrison Penna Limited(You)Henley Business School LimitedThe Activation Project CICInspire SuffolkEmma Wells TennisPotential Project UK Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | HB Henley Business School Limited Peer · rank #1 | LH Lee Hect Harrison Penna Limited (You) · target supplier | TA The Activation Project CIC Peer · rank #3 | IS Inspire Suffolk Peer · rank #4 | EW Emma Wells Tennis Peer · rank #5 | PP Potential Project UK Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £152k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.9m | £75k(−94%) | £1.9m | £1.3m | £700k | £698k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | — | — | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —