Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How UCS TECHNOLOGIES stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortUCS TECHNOLOGIES(You)CONNECTED KERBToyota GB LtdNHS Fleet Solutions c/o Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation TrTUSKERDIRECT LIMITEDGamma Energy Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CK CONNECTED KERB Peer · rank #1 | TG Toyota GB Ltd Peer · rank #2 | NF | TU TUSKERDIRECT LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | UT UCS TECHNOLOGIES (You) · target supplier | GE Gamma Energy Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £95.0m | £15.4m | £8.9m | £4.1m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £74.2m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £315.0m | £57.6m | £8.9m | £1.4bn | £29k(−100%) | £15.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 8 | 27 | 4 | 5 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —