Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Nanostring Technologies stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNanostring Technologies(You)NHS SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION LIMITED (NHSSC - SCCL)DIASORIN LIMITEDOxford Nanopore Technologies LimitedSCIENTIFIC LABORATORY SUPPLIES LIMITEDTSQUARED P2 LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | NS NHS SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION LIMITED (NHSSC - SCCL) Peer · rank #1 | DI DIASORIN LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | ON Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Peer · rank #3 | SL SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY SUPPLIES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | NT Nanostring Technologies (You) · target supplier | TP TSQUARED P2 LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £20.7m | £1.9m | £248k | £167k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £516k | £437k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £58.2m | £41.3m | £165.2m | £107.2m | £1.1m(−98%) | £20.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 115 | 4 | 2 | 9 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —