Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Cowater International Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCowater International Ltd(You)PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDDAI Global UK LtdPALLADIUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITEDDT GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT UK LTD
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | DG DAI Global UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | CI Cowater International Ltd (You) · target supplier | PI PALLADIUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | DG DT GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT UK LTD Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £92.7m | £59.0m | £18.0m | £17.5m(−70%) | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.2m | £22k | — | — | £75.0m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1bn | £1.5bn | £248.3m | £43.8m(−96%) | £1.7bn | £52.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 65 | 75 | 1 | 1(−97%) | 8 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —