Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MACINTYRE HUDSON LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMACINTYRE HUDSON LLP(You)KPMG LLPDeloitte LLPAtosGRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLPDELOITTE LLP - FCA - LONDON EC4A 3BQ
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #2 | AT Atos Peer · rank #3 | GT GRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLP Peer · rank #4 | DL DELOITTE LLP - FCA - LONDON EC4A 3BQ Peer · rank #5 | MH MACINTYRE HUDSON LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £158.5m | £87.7m | £8.2m | £934k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £5.5m | £35k | £4.5m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £1.9bn | £6.3bn | £235.1m | £6.8m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 93 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 1(−96%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —