Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Oyster Information Management Solutions Limited (Oyster IMS) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortOyster Information Management Solutions Limited (Oyster IMS)(You)Phoenix Software LimitedSAP UK LtdDeloitte LLPConcur Holdings (Netherlands) BVCloud Technology Solutions Ltd (CTS) now Qodea Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #1 | SU SAP UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #3 | CH Concur Holdings (Netherlands) BV Peer · rank #4 | OI Oyster Information Management Solutions Limited (Oyster IMS) (You) · target supplier | CT Cloud Technology Solutions Ltd (CTS) now Qodea Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £294.1m | £293.6m | £158.5m | £640k | £70k(−100%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £471k | — | £5.5m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.7bn | £802.5m | £1.9bn | £14.8m | £70k(−100%) | £10.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 220 | 15 | 93 | 3 | 2(−96%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —