Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TnS stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTnS(You)INNOVATE SERVICES LIMITEDCaterlinkBMG RESEARCH LTDXEWLI LIMITEDMELLORS CATERING SERVICES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IS INNOVATE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | CA Caterlink Peer · rank #2 | BR BMG RESEARCH LTD Peer · rank #3 | TN TnS (You) · target supplier | XE XEWLI LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | MC MELLORS CATERING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £30.9m | £26.8m | £1.7m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £200.5m | £199.3m | £30.8m | £902k(−99%) | £19.9m | £85.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 13 | 8 | 13 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —