Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MTMS Ltd T/A MTMAS stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMTMS Ltd T/A MTMAS(You)Balfour Beatty Construction LtdAmalgamated Construction LtdAmalgamated Construction Ltd (t/a AmcoGiffen)Beaver Bridges LtdAmalgamated Construction t/a AmcoGiffen
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BB Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd Peer · rank #1 | AC Amalgamated Construction Ltd Peer · rank #2 | ML MTMS Ltd T/A MTMAS (You) · target supplier | AC Amalgamated Construction Ltd (t/a AmcoGiffen) Peer · rank #4 | BB Beaver Bridges Ltd Peer · rank #5 | AC Amalgamated Construction t/a AmcoGiffen Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £5.2m | £3.7m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £108.3m | £98.6m | £2.1m(−96%) | £1.5m | £48.6m | £570k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 24 | 11 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —