Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Landmark & Associates stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLandmark & Associates(You)AECOM LIMITEDWSP UK LimitedMace Consult LimitedGLEEDS COST MANAGEMENT LIMITEDTetra Tech Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | WU WSP UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #3 | GC GLEEDS COST MANAGEMENT LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | TT Tetra Tech Limited Peer · rank #5 | L& Landmark & Associates (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £224.0m | £91.1m | £70.8m | £35.1m | £13.6m | £162k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £731k | — | £50.4m | £53k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £828.9m | £2.1bn | £738.3m | £335.6m | £211.4m | £162k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 145 | 168 | 15 | 27 | 54 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —