Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Try and Lilly Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 9 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTry and Lilly Ltd(You)SMI INT GROUP LIMITEDWM. NORTHAM & COMPANY LIMITEDHealthy Bean LtdWORKWEAR EXPRESS LIMITEDUKR General Trading Limited
iAuto-picked from 9 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SI SMI INT GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | TA Try and Lilly Ltd (You) · target supplier | WN WM. NORTHAM & COMPANY LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | HB Healthy Bean Ltd Peer · rank #4 | WE WORKWEAR EXPRESS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | UG UKR General Trading Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £90k | £36k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £21.2m | £36k(−100%) | £18.6m | £76.8m | £7.4m | £10.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 2(0%) | — | 1 | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —