Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Fisher Scientific Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortFisher Scientific Ltd(You)CBRE Managed Services LimitedS.I.Sealy & Associates LtdBUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITEDPure energy groupAmeresco Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CM CBRE Managed Services Limited Peer · rank #1 | S& S.I.Sealy & Associates Ltd Peer · rank #2 | BD BUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | FS Fisher Scientific Ltd (You) · target supplier | PE Pure energy group Peer · rank #5 | AM Ameresco Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £60.3m | £1.4m | £672k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £53k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.7bn | £67.9m | £24.9m | £33.0m(−51%) | £13.9m | £2.1bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 13 | 2 | 10 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —