Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NORBECK LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNORBECK LIMITED(You)SoftcatBritish Telecommunications PLCQuickline Communications LimitedWessex InternetGigaclear Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | BT British Telecommunications PLC Peer · rank #2 | NO NORBECK LIMITED (You) · target supplier | QC Quickline Communications Limited Peer · rank #4 | WI Wessex Internet Peer · rank #5 | GI Gigaclear Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £450.8m | £53.0m | £50k(−100%) | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | £186k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £2.9bn | £50k(−100%) | £311.8m | £99.1m | £115.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 474 | 33 | 1(−100%) | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —