Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How N.FraserRoofing limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortN.FraserRoofing limited(You)Amber Construction Services LtdUnited Living (South) LimitedELM SITE SERVICES LIMITEDMasher Brothers LimitedAmeresco Limited
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AC Amber Construction Services Ltd Peer · rank #1 | N. N.FraserRoofing limited (You) · target supplier | UL United Living (South) Limited Peer · rank #3 | ES ELM SITE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | MB Masher Brothers Limited Peer · rank #5 | AM Ameresco Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.8m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £184.0m | — | £2.2bn | £9.1m | £12.1m | £2.1bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | — | — | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —