Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Garnock MOT Centre stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGarnock MOT Centre(You)Fleet Factors LtdLister WilderGlendale Countryside LtdGSF Car Parts LimitedBrush Technology Ltd
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | FF Fleet Factors Ltd Peer · rank #1 | LW Lister Wilder Peer · rank #2 | GC Glendale Countryside Ltd Peer · rank #3 | GC GSF Car Parts Limited Peer · rank #4 | GM Garnock MOT Centre (You) · target supplier | BT Brush Technology Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £11.1m | £1.3m | £641k | £300k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £93k | — | £174k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £145.7m | £31.1m | £180.4m | £7.6m | — | £9.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 8 | 16 | 1 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —