Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Teague and Sally Ltd. stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTeague and Sally Ltd.(You)Mace Consult LimitedMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDS J M and Co. LtdNow Construction LtdAllies & Morrison
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | TA Teague and Sally Ltd. (You) · target supplier | SJ S J M and Co. Ltd Peer · rank #4 | NC Now Construction Ltd Peer · rank #5 | A& Allies & Morrison Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £70.7m | £61.7m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.6m | £22k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £738.3m | £1.5bn | — | £20.0m | £3.8m | £31.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 15 | 77 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —