Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Manchester City Council stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortManchester City Council(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCSAP UK LtdIpsos (Market Research) LtdIFF ResearchCritiqom Limited trading as Adare SEC Ltd
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | SU SAP UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | I( Ipsos (Market Research) Ltd Peer · rank #3 | IR IFF Research Peer · rank #4 | MC Manchester City Council (You) · target supplier | CL Critiqom Limited trading as Adare SEC Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £765.8m | £285.7m | £25.5m | £10.4m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £62.3m | — | £2.6m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.5bn | £802.5m | £111.2m | £10.4m | £1.4m(−99%) | £3.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 47 | 15 | 40 | 2 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —