Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CMS LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCMS LLP(You)AshurstMILLS & REEVE LLPDLA PIPER EUROPE LLPTLT LLPBurges Salmon LLP
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AS Ashurst Peer · rank #1 | M& MILLS & REEVE LLP Peer · rank #2 | DP DLA PIPER EUROPE LLP Peer · rank #3 | TL TLT LLP Peer · rank #4 | BS Burges Salmon LLP Peer · rank #5 | CM CMS LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £13.3m | £10.5m | £7.2m | £5.3m | £5.2m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £685k | £55k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £228.9m | £190.9m | £173.4m | £182.1m | £214.5m | £287k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 28 | 21 | 24 | 28 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —