Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Due to the sensitive nature of this contract the supplier name will be withheld stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 17 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortDue to the sensitive nature of this contract the supplier name will be withheld(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCSoftcatPhoenix Software LimitedTriad Group PLCRedesmere Limited
iAuto-picked from 17 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #3 | TG Triad Group PLC Peer · rank #4 | RE Redesmere Limited Peer · rank #5 | DT Due to the sensitive nature of this contract the supplier name will be withheld (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £641.7m | £443.8m | £293.8m | £2.8m | £832k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £48.3m | £471k | — | £5.8m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £1.6bn | £3.7bn | £82.4m | £32.1m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 38 | 463 | 219 | 3 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —