Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Bomag GB Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBomag GB Limited(You)Equifax LimitedLister WilderGladstone MRM LtdRedwood GlobalT C HARRISON J C B
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EQ Equifax Limited Peer · rank #1 | LW Lister Wilder Peer · rank #2 | GM Gladstone MRM Ltd Peer · rank #3 | RG Redwood Global Peer · rank #4 | BG Bomag GB Limited (You) · target supplier | TC T C HARRISON J C B Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.8m | £1.3m | £865k | £41k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £39.8m | £31.1m | £6.4m | £3.0m | — | £103k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 8 | 6 | 1 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —