Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SAS Silent Waves stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSAS Silent Waves(You)RS ComponentsSchneider Electric Systems UK LtdGarner Osborne Circuits Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SS SAS Silent Waves (You) · target supplier | RC RS Components Peer · rank #2 | SE Schneider Electric Systems UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | GO Garner Osborne Circuits Ltd Peer · rank #4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £19k(−99%) | £9.3m | £3.3m | £336k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | 3 | 2 | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 1(−95%) | 48 | 22 | 10 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —