Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Glass Resort Ltd (TA Pro Sight) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGlass Resort Ltd (TA Pro Sight)(You)PA ConsultingBRUKER UK LIMITEDComposite IntegrationWinding Services LtdSitek Process Solutions Inc
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA Consulting Peer · rank #1 | BU BRUKER UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | CI Composite Integration Peer · rank #3 | GR Glass Resort Ltd (TA Pro Sight) (You) · target supplier | WS Winding Services Ltd Peer · rank #5 | SP Sitek Process Solutions Inc Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £99.9m | £3.2m | £135k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £303.7m | £90.9m | £439k | — | £299k | £80k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 14 | 2 | — | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —