Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Ironmongery Direct stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortIronmongery Direct(You)M&J Group (Construction & Roofing) LtdEQUANS Regeneration LimitedC.L.C. CONTRACTORS LIMITEDHankinson Whittle LimitedHERTS HERITAGE BUILDING AND ROOFING LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MG M&J Group (Construction & Roofing) Ltd Peer · rank #1 | ER EQUANS Regeneration Limited Peer · rank #2 | CC C.L.C. CONTRACTORS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | HW Hankinson Whittle Limited Peer · rank #4 | HH HERTS HERITAGE BUILDING AND ROOFING LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | ID Ironmongery Direct (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £288.8m | £162.1m | £91.3m | £31.3m | £29.4m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £214.4m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1bn | £2.3bn | £3.0bn | £54.1m | £41.8m | £25k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 17 | 20 | 43 | 4 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —