Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How QED Poland stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortQED Poland(You)ENTSERV UK LIMITEDSoftcatCOMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITEDOpencast Software Europe LimitedCrayon Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EU ENTSERV UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | C( COMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | OS Opencast Software Europe Limited Peer · rank #4 | CR Crayon Limited Peer · rank #5 | QP QED Poland (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.0bn | £443.8m | £106.6m | £23.6m | £602k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £48.3m | £7.5m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £1.6bn | £1.4bn | £146.3m | £141.5m | £1.0m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 463 | 96 | 3 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —