Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How UAP LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortUAP LIMITED(You)SoftcatEQUANS Regeneration LimitedHankinson Whittle LimitedHERTS HERITAGE BUILDING AND ROOFING LIMITEDJIGSAW SYSTEMS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | ER EQUANS Regeneration Limited Peer · rank #2 | HW Hankinson Whittle Limited Peer · rank #3 | HH HERTS HERITAGE BUILDING AND ROOFING LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | JS JIGSAW SYSTEMS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | UA UAP LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £443.8m | £192.2m | £50.3m | £29.4m | £253k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £2.3bn | £54.1m | £35.9m | £106.5m | £35k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 463 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —