Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Nanosonics stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNanosonics(You)Equans EandS Solutions LimitedMEARS LIMITEDClaremont Living Group LtdTorbay Schools ServicesIHSS Ltd
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EE Equans EandS Solutions Limited Peer · rank #1 | ME MEARS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | NA Nanosonics (You) · target supplier | CL Claremont Living Group Ltd Peer · rank #4 | TS Torbay Schools Services Peer · rank #5 | IH IHSS Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £128.1m | £29.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £128.1m | £4.2bn | — | £86.2m | £57.0m | £14.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 5 | 2(0%) | 2 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —