Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How KPMG FEES LLP ACCOUNT stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortKPMG FEES LLP ACCOUNT(You)Deloitte LLPGRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLPZurich MunicipalMarsh Insurance BrokersCOMPETENCE ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS LTD
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | GT GRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLP Peer · rank #2 | ZM Zurich Municipal Peer · rank #3 | KF KPMG FEES LLP ACCOUNT (You) · target supplier | MI Marsh Insurance Brokers Peer · rank #5 | CA COMPETENCE ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS LTD Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £152.8m | £9.0m | £1.4m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £4.5m | £75k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £236.0m | £220.0m | — | £7.5m | £1.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 94 | 26 | 28 | — | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —