Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Qubic stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortQubic(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCSoftcatEQUANS Regeneration LimitedHankinson Whittle LimitedJIGSAW SYSTEMS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | ER EQUANS Regeneration Limited Peer · rank #3 | HW Hankinson Whittle Limited Peer · rank #4 | JS JIGSAW SYSTEMS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | QU Qubic (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £642.6m | £445.6m | £192.2m | £50.3m | £253k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £48.3m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £1.6bn | £2.3bn | £54.1m | £106.5m | £9k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 467 | 19 | 5 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —