Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Noahs Ark Environmental Services Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNoahs Ark Environmental Services Ltd(You)SDK Environmental LimitedSt Giles Animal Centre LtdBromsgrove District CouncilMidland Environmental ContractsClassified Information
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | NA Noahs Ark Environmental Services Ltd (You) · target supplier | SE SDK Environmental Limited Peer · rank #2 | SG St Giles Animal Centre Ltd Peer · rank #3 | BD Bromsgrove District Council Peer · rank #4 | ME Midland Environmental Contracts Peer · rank #5 | CI Classified Information Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £117k(−77%) | £4.2m | £500k | £482k | £1.1m | £300k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | — | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —