Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How M.A.M.CHILDMINDERSERVICE stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortM.A.M.CHILDMINDERSERVICE(You)KANGAROO POUCH LIMITEDNational Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to ChildrenBarking & DagenhamHAVERING MIND
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | M. M.A.M.CHILDMINDERSERVICE (You) · target supplier | KP KANGAROO POUCH LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | NS | B& Barking & Dagenham Peer · rank #4 | HM HAVERING MIND Peer · rank #5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | |||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | — | £198k | £106k | £23k | £504k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 1 | ||||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —