Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Dobbie and Michie Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortDobbie and Michie Ltd(You)Thomas Sinden LtdCONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITEDMatthews and TannertMiles Macadam LtdBlakedown Landscapes (SE) Ltd
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TS Thomas Sinden Ltd Peer · rank #1 | CC CONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #3 | MM Miles Macadam Ltd Peer · rank #4 | BL Blakedown Landscapes (SE) Ltd Peer · rank #5 | DA Dobbie and Michie Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £258.9m | £11.1m | £7.1m | £6.4m | £1.1m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £631k | — | £199k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £665.3m | £62.1m | £207.7m | £12.9m | £32.5m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 6 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —