Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How HARBOROUGH HIRE CENTRE PLANT LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHARBOROUGH HIRE CENTRE PLANT LTD(You)BOWMER AND KIRKLAND LIMITEDROSE BUILDERS LTDPREMIER MODULAR LIMITEDPORTAKABIN LIMITEDACTIFORM LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BA BOWMER AND KIRKLAND LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | RB ROSE BUILDERS LTD Peer · rank #2 | PM PREMIER MODULAR LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | PO PORTAKABIN LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AC ACTIFORM LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | HH HARBOROUGH HIRE CENTRE PLANT LTD (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £38.2m | £6.8m | £6.3m | £5.7m | £239k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £505k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.4bn | £41.4m | £113.9m | £704.4m | £56.3m | £1.2m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —