Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Procure Leask Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortProcure Leask Limited(You)Deloitte LLPERNST & YOUNG LLPBaringa Partners LLPSSCLSUSTENIC LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #2 | BP Baringa Partners LLP Peer · rank #3 | PL Procure Leask Limited (You) · target supplier | SS SSCL Peer · rank #5 | SU SUSTENIC LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £420.8m | £99.3m | £20.7m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.7m | £963k | £10.7m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.8bn | £1.8bn | £166.9m | — | £159.4m | £2.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 92 | 56 | 21 | — | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —