Social Mobility Commission - Qualitative research understanding the experiences of young people who are NEET
Estimated value
£80k
Awarded value
—
Suppliers
0
Lots
1
Published
07 Dec 2025
This is a preliminary market engagement notice
Map the supplier landscape and document your shortlist before opening the tender. The market simulation produces a defensible audit record you can attach to your procurement file.
Description
The Social Mobility Commission (SMC) monitors progress towards improving social mobility in the UK and promotes social mobility in England. It is an independent statutory body created by an Act of Parliament. The SMC is conducting qualitative research to understand the lived experiences of young people who are NEET (Not in Education, Employment, or Training), the factors that lead to them becoming and remaining NEET, and the barriers to effective support. This project aims to address key gaps in existing research, particularly the need for qualitative understanding of how complex, co-occurring, and compounding factors contribute to being NEET, and to examine this issue through a social mobility lens. The approach will be qualitative and phased, including a pilot in Blackpool with the potential to roll-out to two other high-NEET areas in North East England and the West Midlands (to be determined with the SMC). The supplier is required to deliver the Blackpool Pilot phase, which includes: - Carrying out semi-structured interviews with young people who are NEET in Blackpool with the aim of understanding young people's lived experiences of becoming NEET, their daily lives, and how support could be improved. - Carrying out one or two follow-up focus groups to consider what NEET young people think would help their return to education, employment or training. - Utilising a sampling approach that aims for diversity across key characteristics such as age, race, sex, and disability status. - Recruiting participants through local stakeholders such as the Blackpool Trailblazer, or other methods.. - Ensuring the research uses local youth forums to support development of interview questions and validate findings - Ensure that the pilot methodology established is robust for potential roll-out to other areas. - Using quantitative insights from relevant official and reliable data sources, ideally accessed at the local level to help contextualise the findings. The budget for this pilot is between £ 50k to 80k excluding VAT (to be confirmed). Following the Pilot, the supplier will be required to replicate the study in two other geographical areas. Potentially in the North East England and West Midlands Combined Authority trailblazers. Objectives and Deliverables Pilot study: - Submitting research plan and ethical proposal by March 2026 - Fieldwork completed by June 2026 - Final report by August 2026 Subsequent research locations: - Timelines to be agreed, with final report delivery by August 2027. About our organisation The Social Mobility Commission exists to create a United Kingdom where the circumstances of birth do not determine outcomes in life. It is responsible for: - Publishing an annual report setting out our views on the progress made towards improving social mobility in the United Kingdom. - Promoting social mobility in England, for example, by supporting employers, the professions, universities and schools to play their part in promoting social mobility. - Carrying out and publishing research in relation to social mobility. - Providing advice to ministers (at their request) on how to improve social mobility in England - this advice must then be published. The strategic objectives of the SMC are - To change the debate on social mobility. - To provide independent advice to policy and decision makers cross-sector, so they understand how to consider socio-economic disadvantage as part of their work. - To catalyse meaningful and measurable action by local and national government that can improve outcomes for all.
Scope
- Reference
- SMC-2526-100
- Total value
- £80,000 excluding VAT£96,000 including VATBelow the relevant threshold
- Commercial tool
- Standalone contract
- Contract dates
- 01 Feb 2026 to 31 Aug 2026Possible extension to 31 Aug 2027
A potential 6-month extension will be permitted, but only in negotiations with the winning supplier and only for time, not additional costs.
- Main category
- services
- CPV classifications
- 79315000
- Contract locations
- UK, United Kingdom
- Particular suitability
- Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME)Voluntary, community and social enterprises (VCSE)
Award criteria
Criteria the buyer will use to evaluate bids.
| Name | Description | Type | Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial scoring | Financial scoring represents 20% of the overall evaluation. The bidder with the cheapest overall price will receive 20 marks and all other bids will be marked as a proportional variance from the top scoring bid. The formula being used for Relative Assessment for this procurement is: Bid Score = (Lowest Price/bid price) x 20 E.g. a bid that is 10% more expensive will receive 18 marks; one that is twice the price will receive 10 marks | cost | 20.00% |
| Does the proposal describe a robust method / suitable approach | - Demonstrates a clear understanding of the objectives and approaches outlined - Creative and constructive thinking demonstrated by the proposed approach to this project in meeting the objectives - The suitability of the proposed approach to deliver against requirements, and identification of any opportunities to add value to this | quality | 20.00% |
| Team and organisational experience in conducting similar work | - Demonstrate experience of the team doing relevant work, specifically in conducting successful interviews with potentially vulnerable young people - Evidence of experience in the challenges and considerations involved in this work - How the skills and experience of the team will be used and managed to best effect (where there is a partnership please include specific about how this will be managed, add value and any experience of successful collaboration) - Specifics about the methodology and quality assurance process - Specifics about ethical and safeguarding processes | quality | 20.00% |
| Risks and mitigations and data protection | - That the risks and challenges are considered and mitigation integrated into the proposed methodology - Consideration of security, confidentiality and data protection | quality | 8.00% |
| Presentation | - Clear articulation of plans for presenting work in clear and eye-catching ways - Evidence of ability to deliver high quality research, fieldwork and outputs - Ability to present findings clearly in both writing and visual formats (e.g. PowerPoints tailored to a range of audiences - analysts, commissioners, wider secretariat | quality | 16.00% |
| Project management | - Clear plan for communication and demonstration of a collaborative approach to taking the work forward, working closely with SMC as appropriate. - Evidence of organisational capacity, project management and quality assurance procedures, to deliver the project in the specified timescales and quality - The quality, timing and suitability of proposed outputs | quality | 16.00% |